jd:/dev/blog - Tag - apt-build - Commentaires

Article about apt-build - MAxime

MAxime — Mon, 12 Feb 2007 01:44:12 +0000

THANKS DUDE FOR SUPPORTING ME... BY THE WAY U OWe ME 10000000000 million dollars for the corrections.... By the waymy english powns yours.

In the core of apt - Julien Danjou

Julien Danjou — Thu, 17 Feb 2005 17:10:16 +0000

Anonymous coward:

When I worked at Mandrakesoft, I had to use URPMI (the Perl lib), and fortunately the original author Francois Pons explained me how it works, because there is no many comments in the source.

So I can compare, and yes apt rox

In the core of apt - Anonymous coward

Anonymous coward — Thu, 17 Feb 2005 17:04:00 +0000

> APT IS A MAZE !

Ahah. Just for fun, once, take a look at urpmi (Mandrake package (mis)handling tool), and try not to die from a heart attack: returns 0 for some errors, or sometimes returns the same code for different errors, without even talking about Mandrake package naming scheme, which is a terrible mess. So, you can't complain, you're a lucky man.

apt-build 0.10.0 - sod`

sod` — Thu, 06 Jan 2005 20:28:40 +0000

Salut,

Peut-on désormais utiliser apt-build pour builder tout son système ? Par exemple, c'était plus ou moins foireux pour certains paquets critiques auparavant, comme la libc6 et cie ... as tu essayé ? ça fonctionne bien maintenant ? As tu eu des retours d'expérience de personnes utilisant le cvs ?

In the core of apt - sod`

sod` — Sun, 02 Jan 2005 14:13:08 +0000

Tu as l'air de te réinvestir dans le projet apt-build, et à vrai dire, je t'en félicite. Cependant, juste une question et une remarque (qui seront peut-être superflue, vu que je n'ai pas lu le code du programme) : pourquoi n'utilises-tu pas la librairie perl libapt-pkg-perl ? (elle n'est peut etre pas adaptée à ce que tu souhaites faire). Et dans le cas ou elle n'est pas utile, as tu l'intention de faire une librairie perl pour controler la gestion des paquets ? Je pense qu'une telle librairie serait ***vraiment*** utilisée et très utile ...

Sur ces quelques remarques, bon courage (et bonne année)

apt-build revolutions - Lunar

Lunar — Fri, 31 Dec 2004 18:45:35 +0000

More than the optimisation thing, what I find really interesting in apt-build is the patch feature.

Mailman is a good example of a package in which you happen to add a lot of patch. It would be great if apt-build could track patches applied and reapply them during apt-build upgrade...

apt-build revolutions - Steve Kemp

Steve Kemp — Fri, 31 Dec 2004 16:35:09 +0000

PS.

http://www.debtoo.org/

apt-build revolutions - Steve

Steve — Fri, 31 Dec 2004 16:33:32 +0000

Looks like an interesting tool, my solution was "debian-builder" and "wrap-gcc" which is written in perl.

I started so that I could use the SSP protection offered by GCC, but it's very similar to your wrapper and pentium-builder which I think is still in the archive.

Steve

apt-build revolutions - :emaN

:emaN — Fri, 31 Dec 2004 16:02:57 +0000

Yeah, kill Gentoo #_#

Debian stuff - neo

neo — Wed, 15 Dec 2004 08:18:01 +0000

You don't really have to clear your mind, but you have to clear your stomach of all different alcohols you drunk this last days :p

Article about apt-build - artime

artime — Tue, 14 Dec 2004 14:11:26 +0000

Not yet read it. Just posted to indicate that the link to GNU stow's article is broken.

And some comments comparing apt-build with apt-src and apt-fu would be great!

Au relire!

Article about apt-build - Chris Daniel

Chris Daniel — Tue, 14 Dec 2004 06:50:51 +0000

I am liking apt-build, but it's throwing errors about a trailing "-" in the directory name of the pkg. I'll submit a real bug report, I promise... Oh, wait, it's a nonexistent source package. nevermind and thanks!